🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.